Awarding it to Putin was a travesty - now corrected. Medvedev's mild rebuke for the revocation is telling.
We live two lives. The one we learn with and the one we live with after that...B. Malamoud
Showing posts with label Vladimir Putin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Vladimir Putin. Show all posts
Wednesday, July 20, 2011
Putin's Enlightenment Award Vaporizes
Awarding it to Putin was a travesty - now corrected. Medvedev's mild rebuke for the revocation is telling.
Saturday, May 14, 2011
Medvedev's Shot Across the Bow of the SS Putin
Al Jazeera is reporting as I sit here that President Dmitry Medvedev said Russia could face civil war or stagnation if too much power was concentrated in the hands of one man, an apparent jibe at the prime minister, Vladimir Putin.
Keep in mind that there is a presidential vote in March 2012. Neither has announced, but it is beginning to look like a showdown.
Here's the money quote in response to a question about parliamentary democracy:
"An excessive concentration of power is indeed a dangerous thing: it has happened in this country many times and as a rule it has either led to stagnation or civil war.
We must not allow that. Attempts to build up power to fit a certain individual are dangerous. If they do not cause trouble today, you must not doubt that they will cause great problems for the country and for the individual in the not-too-distant future. We must think about this and remember the lessons of history."
This is the second veiled attack. The first came earlier this year, when Mr Medvedev slapped down Mr Putin for criticising western military intervention in Libya and then ordered Putin allies to leave the boards of state companies such as Rosneft.
Is Russia becoming interesting again?
This is the second veiled attack. The first came earlier this year, when Mr Medvedev slapped down Mr Putin for criticising western military intervention in Libya and then ordered Putin allies to leave the boards of state companies such as Rosneft.
Is Russia becoming interesting again?
Labels:
Dmitry Medvedev,
Rift,
Russian Federation,
Vladimir Putin
Wednesday, October 6, 2010
The Kremlin vs Minsk
The economic union among Belarus, Russian and Khazakhstan has been delayed for more than six months. There are numerous reasons for this, including the global economic crises. But also figuring into the equation is Russian's aggressive expansion at the expense of Georgia, bullying of Ukraine with threats that the same type of independence movement could strike in the Crimea, and the suspicion that it engineered the coup in the Kyrgyz Republic. All this has made countries like Belarus - regardless of its less than democratic government - move closer to the EU in terms of cooperation. It has not helped Lukashenko's position in the Kremlin that Belarus has refused to recognize S. Ossetia and Abkhazia as independent of Georgia, thereby joining the ranks of Venezuela, Nicaragua and some tiny atoll in the Pacific.
Lukashenko has oppositon, but it is usually not effective. The question is if Moscow will throw its weight, overtly, behind any other contender for the thrown of Minsk. The last time they did that, their man in Kyiv went down to defeat and they have failed miserably in Georgia trying to unseat their least favourite president.
Labels:
Belarus,
Dmitry Medvedev,
Lukashenko,
Marriage on the Rocks,
Russian Federation,
Vladimir Putin,
War of Words
Friday, April 16, 2010
End Game in the Kyrgyz Republic
It is highly unlikely that Astana would have agreed to the flight without checking with Moscow. It is also very likely that Moscow has told the interim government in Bishkek to leave Bakiyev's family alone. If, as they probably will, agree not to arrest and prosecute members of the family - his son, Maxim, in particular - they will need to institute and enforce some serious reforms in the country if they are not to be seen as "more of the same".
Labels:
Astana,
Bishkek,
Kazakhstan,
Kurmanbek Bakiyev,
Kyrgyz Republic,
Moscow,
russia,
Vladimir Putin
Monday, November 9, 2009
Sunday, September 20, 2009
Why Biden was Right about Russia
Image via Wikipedia
I think the analysis is essentially correct, but doesn't go far enough. The Russian people have always been afraid - of chaos, invasion, perceived insults - while simultaneously feeling un-respected. This is a bad combination for any country, but more so for one that became accustomed to throwing its weight around. It breeds less than free societies - and we can see that reversion to a czarist style government beginning with Putin. The Russians like it and we should not pretend otherwise.
Having said that, Russia has very good reason to be afraid. A paranoid world-view does not make it untrue. Russia has been invaded by the Mongols (successfully), France, Germany (twice), Sweden - the list goes on. The ordinary people want to feel safe - whether the reality is different or not.
So, although it is useful to deal cautiously with Russia, it is important to see their view of the world - particularly in their immediate vicinity.
Labels:
France,
Germany,
russia,
Society and Culture,
Sweden,
Vladimir Putin
Saturday, July 11, 2009
Russia's Problem
It did not take long for President Medvedev and PM Putin to reveal that the veneer of success portrayed in the press on the meetings in Moscow with President Obama is just that - a veneer. That veneer was scraped off as President Medvedev announced on July 10 that Russia will deploy short range missiles in Kaliningrad aimed at Warsaw if the BMD deployment in Poland by the US goes forward.
Clearly, the refusal by the United States to discuss either the deployment of the BMD system or Russia's claim of a sphere of influence over its neighbors is a deep annoyance to Putin, who cancelled his attendance at a gala in the Kremlin, resulting in a similar cancellation by President Obama.
As I have posted earlier, the interests of Russia and the United States are not at all similar. Russia wants US and European influence restricted, if not eliminated, in bordering regions. It would be a mistake for the US to accede to Russian desires. Although the BMD system deployment could, and likely should be cancelled, more positioning of US assets in Poland and the Baltic States would be more effective in focusing Russia's attention on the distrust it has cultivated in its near-abroad, Europe and the US.
The problem with Russia is that it does nothing but "oppose" by throwing up roadblocks to any movement toward settlement of issues in key areas of the world - Palestine, Iran, Georgia and Central Asia. This proclivity to create, rather than solve problems, represents the actions of a weak and paranoid state. For it to keep thrusting itself on the political stage as a world power equal to China, the EU or the US is absurd for a variety of economic and social reasons.
Although it deserves respect, Russia's inability to propose solutions other than those masquerading as such but which are always solely targeted at expanding its political sphere of influence, preclude reasonable dialogue at this time.
Clearly, the refusal by the United States to discuss either the deployment of the BMD system or Russia's claim of a sphere of influence over its neighbors is a deep annoyance to Putin, who cancelled his attendance at a gala in the Kremlin, resulting in a similar cancellation by President Obama.
As I have posted earlier, the interests of Russia and the United States are not at all similar. Russia wants US and European influence restricted, if not eliminated, in bordering regions. It would be a mistake for the US to accede to Russian desires. Although the BMD system deployment could, and likely should be cancelled, more positioning of US assets in Poland and the Baltic States would be more effective in focusing Russia's attention on the distrust it has cultivated in its near-abroad, Europe and the US.
The problem with Russia is that it does nothing but "oppose" by throwing up roadblocks to any movement toward settlement of issues in key areas of the world - Palestine, Iran, Georgia and Central Asia. This proclivity to create, rather than solve problems, represents the actions of a weak and paranoid state. For it to keep thrusting itself on the political stage as a world power equal to China, the EU or the US is absurd for a variety of economic and social reasons.
Although it deserves respect, Russia's inability to propose solutions other than those masquerading as such but which are always solely targeted at expanding its political sphere of influence, preclude reasonable dialogue at this time.
Labels:
Balistic Missile Defence,
Barack Obama,
Dmitry Medvedev,
Poland,
russia,
United States,
Vladimir Putin
Monday, July 6, 2009
A Week Hiaitus
I'm back after a quiet week and celebrating the 4th at Spartak Stadium in Kyiv. Today President Obama is in Moscow. This is going to be interesting.
Labels:
Barack Obama,
Dmitry Medvedev,
July 4 2009,
Kyiv,
Moscow,
russia,
Spartak Stadium,
United States,
Vladimir Putin
Monday, June 22, 2009
Coming Apart in the North Caucuses?
Image by Thomas Roche via Flickr
Medvedev and Putin may have a messy problem on their hands after calling the uprisings in neighboring Chechnya over. Russian security forces have responded in the usual manner - heavy-handed and repressive.
Historically, it took the Russian Empire about 150 years to subdue the northern Caucuses. They never really won...
Labels:
BBC,
Chechnya,
Human rights,
Ingushetia,
russia,
Vladimir Putin
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
